Origami vs Apollo.io for B2B Lead Generation: Complete Comparison

Origami uses AI to understand natural language queries and find prospects in real-time. Apollo.io provides a massive contact database with built-in email sequencing. Origami is better for intelligent, signal-based prospecting. Apollo is better for high-volume outreach with a proven database.

Here's the complete breakdown.

Quick Comparison

Feature	Origami	Apollo.io
Approach	AI agent + chat interface	Database + filters
Data Sources	15+ built-in (LinkedIn, jobs, tech stack, etc.)	Proprietary database (270M+)
Email Sequences	Integrations (export to tools)	Built-in
Best For	Signal-based prospecting, AI automation	Volume outbound, all-in-one
Learning Curve	Very low (chat interface)	Low
Free Tier	7-day trial (1,000 credits)	Yes (generous)
Starting Price	$80/mo (5,500 credits)	$49/user/mo
Parallel Processing	1-unlimited agents (plan dependent)	N/A

How They Work

Origami: Conversational AI Agent

With Origami, you chat with an AI agent that builds prospect lists for you:

"Find Series B fintech companies in the US with 100-500 employees that raised funding in the last 6 months and are hiring for sales roles"

The AI agent autonomously searches across 15+ data sources, creates a spreadsheet table with enriched prospects, verifies emails and phone numbers, and returns results ready for outreach. You can also import existing CSVs to enrich with Origami's data.

Key characteristics:

• Natural language chat interface
• 15+ integrated data sources (LinkedIn, job postings, tech stack, Twitter, local businesses, e-commerce stores)
• Autonomous multi-step workflows
• Built-in enrichment and verification
• Signal detection (funding, hiring, news, LinkedIn engagement)
• Pro plan: Run 5 searches simultaneously
• Focus on prospect quality over quantity

Apollo.io: Database-First Platform

Apollo.io gives you access to a 270M+ contact database. You use filters to find matching prospects, add them to lists, and run email sequences—all in one platform.

Key characteristics:

• Massive proprietary database
• Traditional filter-based search
• Built-in email sequencing
• Integrated dialer
• All-in-one workflow

Feature Deep Dive

Data Quality

Origami:

• Aggregates from multiple real-time sources
• AI verifies and cross-references data
• Signal data included (funding, hiring, news)
• Fresher data due to real-time approach
• Smaller total volume, higher average quality

Apollo:

• 270M+ contacts in database
• Data refreshed periodically (not real-time)
• Email accuracy ~85-90%
• Excellent US coverage
• International data less reliable

Winner: Origami for data freshness and signals. Apollo for volume and coverage.

Search Capabilities

Origami:

• Natural language queries
• AI understands context and intent
• Complex criteria in plain English
• Signal-based filtering
• Adaptive to how you describe things

Apollo:

• Traditional filter dropdowns
• Boolean search available
• Saved searches
• Industry, size, location filters
• Technology filters (BuiltWith data)

Winner: Origami for flexibility. Apollo for familiar UI patterns.

Email Outreach

Origami:

• CRM integrations (push to HubSpot, Salesforce)
• Export to CSV
• Works with dedicated email tools
• No built-in sequencing

Apollo:

• Full email sequencing built-in
• Templates and personalization
• A/B testing
• Tracking (opens, clicks, replies)
• Multichannel (email + calls + LinkedIn)

Winner: Apollo for all-in-one outreach. Origami requires additional tools.

Signal Detection

Origami:

• Funding announcements
• Hiring activity
• Executive changes
• Company news
• Technology adoptions
• Real-time monitoring available

Apollo:

• Job changes alerts
• Company updates
• Limited signal depth
• More focused on static data

Winner: Origami for signal-based selling.

Integration Ecosystem

Origami:

• Salesforce
• HubSpot
• Google Sheets
• Slack notifications
• API access

Apollo:

• Salesforce (deep integration)
• HubSpot
• Gmail/Outlook
• Zapier
• API access

Winner: Tie. Both cover major integrations.

Pricing Comparison

Origami Pricing

Plan	Monthly Cost	Credits	Concurrent Agents	Key Features
Trial	Free (7 days)	1,000	1	All data sources, no contact info
Starter	$80	5,500	1	CSV export, email/phone lookup, +$15/1k credits
Pro	$200	16,000	5	Parallel agents, BYOK, 24hr SLA, +$12.50/1k credits
Scale	$500	50,000	Unlimited	Slack channel, SSO/SCIM, 12hr SLA, +$10/1k credits

Apollo.io Pricing

Plan	Monthly Cost	Per User
Free	$0	50 emails/mo
Basic	$49	500 emails/mo
Professional	$99	Unlimited + features
Organization	$149	Enterprise features

Analysis: Apollo appears cheaper per seat ($49 vs $80), but Origami isn't per-seat—entire team shares credits. For a 3-person team, Origami Starter is $80 total vs Apollo at $147 (3 × $49). Plus Origami includes 5,500 credits worth of enrichment built-in.

Origami Pro's 5 concurrent agents means power users can run 5 prospecting searches simultaneously, dramatically speeding up research.

Use Case Comparison

Use Case 1: Quick Prospect List

Scenario: Need 100 qualified leads for a new campaign by end of day.

Origami: Describe criteria, get results in minutes. One workflow.

Apollo: Search database, add filters, export list. Simple but more steps.

Better choice: Tie. Both handle this well.

Use Case 2: Signal-Based Outreach

Scenario: Want to reach companies that just raised funding or hired new executives.

Origami: Built for this. Query by signals directly.

Apollo: Limited signal data. Need external sources.

Better choice: Origami.

Use Case 3: High-Volume Cold Email

Scenario: Send 5,000 personalized cold emails per month.

Origami: Find leads, export, use external email tool.

Apollo: Find leads, build sequences, send and track—all in one.

Better choice: Apollo. Built-in sequencing is valuable.

Use Case 4: Account-Based Marketing

Scenario: Research 50 strategic accounts deeply.

Origami: AI research on each account, signals, news, contacts.

Apollo: Database lookup, basic enrichment.

Better choice: Origami for depth. Apollo for breadth.

Use Case 5: SDR Team Scaling

Scenario: 10-person SDR team doing outbound.

Origami: Everyone queries for their accounts.

Apollo: Shared database, assigned leads, team sequencing.

Better choice: Apollo for team workflow features.

Pros and Cons

Origami Pros

• Natural language makes complex queries easy
• Real-time data is fresher
• Signal detection built-in
• No per-seat pricing
• Faster time to value

Origami Cons

• No built-in email sequencing
• Smaller total database coverage
• Newer platform, smaller ecosystem
• Enterprise features still developing

Apollo Pros

• Massive contact database
• All-in-one platform
• Built-in sequencing and tracking
• Generous free tier
• Well-established, large community

Apollo Cons

• Data can be outdated
• Limited signal capabilities
• Email deliverability concerns at scale
• Per-seat pricing adds up for teams
• International data quality issues

When to Choose Origami

• You value data freshness and signals
• You want natural language queries
• You're doing account-based prospecting
• You already have an email tool you like
• You want AI to do the heavy lifting

When to Choose Apollo

• You need high-volume email outreach
• You want everything in one platform
• You're building a large SDR team
• Budget is tight (generous free tier)
• You prefer traditional filter-based search

Can You Use Both?

Yes. A common pattern:

• Origami for finding and qualifying high-value prospects
• Apollo for email sequencing and high-volume outreach

They complement each other well.

The Verdict

Origami is the future of prospecting—AI-native, signal-based, and designed for the way people actually think about their ideal customers.

Apollo is the reliable workhorse—proven database, built-in outreach, and everything you need in one platform.

For teams prioritizing signal-based selling and prospect quality, Origami wins. For teams prioritizing volume and all-in-one simplicity, Apollo wins.

Many teams will benefit from using both.

---

Ready to try AI-native prospecting?

Start Free 7-Day Trial (1,000 Credits) →